HPV Detection in Clinician-Collected, Self-Collected Vagina, Urine, and Menstrual Blood Samples
Ho SKD, Liu S, Lau LSK, et al.Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease · 2026DOI 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000954
In plain language
A prospective study of 167 premenopausal women referred to a Hong Kong colposcopy clinic after an abnormal Pap smear, each giving self-collected vaginal, urine and menstrual blood samples alongside a clinician-collected cervical sample, all tested for high-risk HPV with the same assay. Menstrual blood agreed with clinician-collected results in 82.1% of cases and had a relative sensitivity of 0.83 for high-grade lesions, and only self-collected vaginal samples matched clinician sampling for detecting them.
Key numbers
- 167
- Women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal Pap smear
- 82.1%
- Agreement with clinician-collected HPV results
- 0.83
- Relative sensitivity for HSIL versus clinician sampling
What it means
In a head-to-head comparison, menstrual blood performed in the same range as urine and below a self-collected vaginal swab. It places menstrual blood among the self-sampling options rather than ahead of them.
What it does not show
All participants had already had an abnormal Pap smear, so results may differ in routine screening. A single-center study with 42 high-grade cases.
How to cite
Ho SKD, Liu S, Lau LSK, Cheung ANY, Chu MY, Tse KY, et al. HPV Detection in Clinician-Collected, Self-Collected Vagina, Urine, and Menstrual Blood Samples. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2026;30(3):169-174. doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000954